Time to Solve Norway’s Jellyfish Problem

In 2009 Matt Taibi in the wake of the financial crises undertook a memorable diatribe in Rolling Stone magazine, famously describing Goldman Sachs as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money”.  The article is an entertaining yet depressing ode to the corrupt and destructive nature of unregulated international finance. However, while most of Europe is still suffering from the fallout of the latest global financial crises, Norway has largely remained aloof from the worst of it.  Its citizens, protected from within by a tight social safety net woven with a compound of oil and social democratic principles, and from external forces a by a sturdy safety cage of strict banking regulation, tariffs and only partial EU integration. As a result, the tentacles of international finance have so far (touch wood) been unable to reach far into Norwegian society or to inflict much harm on its populace. Nevertheless, while the vampire squid is largely kept at bay, there is one local sea creature of private industry that inexplicably is allowed to float around with impunity within the cage and through the safety net.  From a distance it appears benign: all of Norway’s neighbours have similar and largely harmless members of the the same family, but a closer look reveals Norway’s strain has a much more vicious sting capable of inflicting disproportionate harm on the weakest members of Norwegian society. I am talking of course about the jellyfish of Norwegian dentists.

A Norwegian dentist in their natural habitat

As an Englishman who just got two root canals, in criticising the Norwegian dental system I realise I am setting myself up for a multitude of scorn and mockery. Well, I will save time and make a joke for you.  If English people had to pay as much as Norwegian’s for their dental treatment, they would owe more to their dentist than to their mortgage provider. Ha ha!  It is funny because English people have notoriously bad teeth and Norwegians pay extortionate fees for their dentists.   I’m not talking 50% more expensive or even 500% we are talking sometimes more than 1000% more expensive. For example,  a root canal in Norway costs roughly 5000 NOK in the UK its a mere 452NOK (at current rates). Meanwhile a check up in the UK costs 170 NOK  in Norway its 800 NOK . The funny thing is, that English people, accustomed to entirely free health care actually complain about it being expensive.

This huge difference in price is largely accounted for by significant subsidies from the UK government. They have long considered, (logically in this authors opinion) that teeth are a vital part of public health and should therefore come under the umbrella of the National Health Service (NHS).  Norwegians meanwhile, left at the mercy of an entirely private dental industry, bear the full cost of whatever work that is needed in adulthood.

I wouldn’t be particularly surprised in almost any other country, but Norway’s state provision and willingness to intervene in society is so wide ranging in every other area that appears like a black hole in the otherwise extremely detailed blueprint for the paternal state. Yes teeth, the white things you need to eat food, the stuff you need to stay breathing, are not considered part of healthcare.

This is, therefore, not about relative price comparison, but about an incongruous public policy.  Norwegian wage levels are the highest in Europe and labour costs make up the majority of costs in dentistry – that Norway pays the most in absolute terms for their dentists is hardly surprising. What is surprising though, is that from 19 to old age typical Norwegian citizens have to pay the full cost of their dental work without any cap on the maximum or help from the state. I found this so difficult to believe that I emailed the relevant people and had it confirmed by a spokesperson from The Norwegian Health Economics Administration (HELFO) who I can (smugly) quote as replying to my email about the matter with  “your observations are correct” (I should stress they were referring to the sentence before the last rather than the jellyfish metaphor).

It is not just the UK to which Norwegian dental provision compares poorly.  Almost all of Western Europe covers a significant portion of their adult population’s dental health costs. Norway’s rivals and neighbours Sweden for instance pay 50% of their citizens bills after the first 3000 SEK and 85% after 7500SEK. They also provide 150 to 300 annual subsidy specifically for dentist workto encourage check ups.  In Denmark, under 25s have to pay just 35% of their costs while over 25s pay 60% of their costs.

The pattern becomes even stranger when you take Norway’s economy into account. In a study of 9  European countries’ dentist costs (including Denmark, Germany Netherlands,  in 2008 found that there was a solid correlation between the amount of the government subsidy and the GDP per capita of the population (interestingly all had at least some government intervention, it was merely a question of degrees). A higher GDP per capita usually translated into a greater proportion of the dental costs being covered by the state. Considering this pattern, together with Norway’s wealth and famously comprehensive welfare provisions, Norway’s dental policy is beyond bizarre; it is negligent.

I only discovered all this recently when I began to suffer excruciating toothache and went to my local Norwegian dentist to get it looked at. I balked at the bill for the check up, but mostly at the astronomical quote for the work that needed to be done.  Knowing that I could pop back to England and get it done for one tenth of the cost I reasoned I shouldn’t complain too much. Besides,  as a non Norwegian citizen already lucky enough to have my masters degree subsidised by the Norwegian people it would be a bit unreasonable  to expect them to do the same for my teeth.  It was only when I mentioned it to some  friends that I found out that Norwegian adult citizens, save the unemployed, have to pay the same as me for dental work that I became shocked.  And so were my Norwegian friends when I told them the cost in the UK. They had obviously assumed they had the best or at least parity with the rest of the world on welfare public provision. To save time  I will paraphrase the conversations that  followed.

No! British dentists don’t use a hammer and pick axe or any violently unsuitable household tool (ha ha), the bad teeth thing is (these days) largely a myth but if it does exist its nothing to do with dentists lack of training but  a poverty related habit thing so making jokes about it is essentially just the same as laughing at poor people. And yes that’s very good, under 18 Nordmenn might get free dental treatment but so does almost every under 18 in almost any semi developed country, it’s hardly something for the world’s second richest country to crow about. Seriously? Do you really think that if you didn’t have to pay for the dentist you would stop brushing your teeth?

Anyway, with my interest piqued I asked all  the Norwegian’s I know about their lack of public provision for dental work.  There was almost complete consensus that it was both strange and unpopular.  Amongst the 20 somethings in the bar where I work,  hardly any had gone for a check up since they were 18 (and the end of free treatment).  Meanwhile, the businessmen I teach English, mostly in their 40s an 50s all agreed that it was absurd and began exchanging stories about how they travel abroad if they need any work done.  When you have a substantial number of citizens going abroad for treatment, even rich ones, it would appear to be symptomatic of a failing system. What’s interesting is that even parties normally opposed to government intervention in the market favour inclusion of dental cover in state health care.  I spoke recently with a friend who is on the Liberal party policy board about the issue.  She told me that it had been on the agenda for the manifesto this year but after discussion they concluded that it was too costly. This would suggest there is a  consensus of left and right in Norway and the only obstacle is economic rather than ideological.

A sensible policy could  be to start incrementally with affordable practical measures targeting those the current system leaves most vulnerable. There would seem to be sense in the Danish system of helping out young adults and the Swedish idea of annual voucher system to encourage check ups.  Why not provide subsidised or even mandatory annual check ups to Norwegian citizens under 30 for example?   To this section of society, squeezed by high rents and lower wages, the 800NOK cost of a health check up is unlikely to ever feel affordable or necessary.  Yet the costs of waiting until they get a toothache, are much more severe. One  feature of dental problems are that they are eminently preventable and certainly cheaper to treat if caught early enough.  This is a classic example of how average an citizen often does not necessarily behave in a rational way. Instead, short term cost aversion overrides long term common sense as my colleagues at my bar would appear to demonstrate.   Equally, there seems to be wisdom in the Swedish system; incrementally reducing the percentage paid by the citizen as the cost escalates. This would avoid bankrupting any poor fellow who has the misfortune to require two root canals while working in a low paid job. This situation highlights obvious regressive nature of dental fees.  They are only a really a significant worry for the low paid workers but merely an irritant for the rich. Given the progressive nature of the rest of Norwegian society this facet of the problem makes it yet more bewildering that it hasn’t already been addressed.

My HELFO contact explained that the “why” question is “a political one” they could not answer.  They suggested that “the ministry of health would be the correct address for this question”.  Currently, different costing models for a government scheme for dental cover are under review, but this embarrassing jellyfish problem has been on the agenda for a long time now without any change in policy.  Endless talking has produced nothing but hot air.  If you agree it’s time to take the sting out of Norwegian dental costs, then help it happen, and send a tweet to the to the ministry of health  @helse_og_omsorg  and give them a a little kick in the right direction.

For more quasi political humour and comment you can follow me on twitter here


About Paul David Beaumont

Occasional journalist, part-time socialist & full time International Relations PhD student. Available for hire - but never in the morning. Academia page: https://umb.academia.edu/PaulBeaumont
This entry was posted in Notes on Norway and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Time to Solve Norway’s Jellyfish Problem

  1. Christoph says:

    I admire the Norwegians for the wisdom of their system as far as dentistry is concerned.
    I have served more than 25 years as a dentist in Germany, where the coverage of dental assurance is even much better than in Great Britain and where they have a very impressiv amount of regulations and fee codes, to guarantee cheap or even free dental service for everybody.
    The result is, that many theeth are killed slowly and painfully, by often very expensive overtreatment.
    My conclusion is, that the Germans would have better dental health and less toothpain, if any dental assurance for persons over 21 would even be forbidden by law.
    The same would be true for Britain and other European countries – on the presupposition, that in the childhood und youth, there would have been an efficient public dental service as it is in Norway.
    One should see high costs for dental service in the adulthood as a penalty for having not learned or been to lazy to clean once theeth efficently – that is to say not just with a toothbrush, but with dental tape and/or interdental brushes and daily.
    Furthermore, visible teeth can be replaced within a day with a removable denture for an rather moderate price (in Germany its often less then 200 Euro). This type of denture looks good and it can serve suffiently well for some month or even years, until the patient has saved enough money for a more comfortable replacements. In many countries, this type of cheap plastic denture even is the final one.
    Molar teeth which are not visible, are nice if you have them and if the are healthy. If only a “root canal” can save them and if you have the money (and the dentist!) for a high quality treatment, get the root canal. But if you don’t have the money and/or the dentist, you probably will find out that missing that tooth will not impaire your ability to laugh, to speak and to eat. If you still want that molar to be replaced, you don’t need to hurry and have time to save the money needed to replace that tooth with some kind of good quality denture or an implant.

    Every fissure were caries can and will develop, should be known and treated for the rest of your live at the age of 18 or 21, when in Norway the state does not pay for dental treatment any longer.
    The oldest filling I have ever seen was 72 years old when I saw it and it was still intact.
    Some types of parodontitis and the results of heavy attrition may be a different problem. But my opinion is, that these are treated much better and more efficient if the patient has no insurance and has to pay the bill on his/her own, as is the case in Norway.

    Don’t buy an assurance for any damage that will struck you with a very high probability or if paying for a damage will not ruin you. This is, because any assurance will need some bureaucracy, managers and profits. Furthermore there will probably be some fraud. Those assured have to pay for all of this, as well as for all of what the assurance pays to them.
    Thus on average you allways have to pay much more for the any assurance than you will get out of it. As lang as you assure catastrophic losses with small probalities, that will hit you randomly, an assurance may still be worth its price. But don’t sign an assurance to your teeth as long as you don’t sign one to pay for the clothing and the food you will need to buy next year. Don’t ask a state to dissipate its peoples wealth with an assurance that is not only useless but even a risk to the peoples health.
    An other point is, that any type assurance for dental work may put up restrictions and limits that may be good for them, but not for you and your health.

    As fare as your exampels of British dental fees are concerned:
    You can do dentistry in very different ways. Read “Dentistry and its Victims” from Marvin Schissel, to get an idea of what you might get for NHI-Fees in Britain – if you can find an NHI-Dentist at all.
    Here are some examples of Britisch dental fees: http://splendidbritain.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/CCE00000.jpg that are fare higher than the NHI-Fees you mentioned.
    Why do people in Britain pay such high prices for dental treatment, if the NHI-Dentists deliver good quality work in a sufficient quantity?
    Some answers are here:
    and here
    where the headline was:
    “British dental care is the most expensive in Europe”

  2. I have been exploring for a little bit for any high quality articles or blog posts on this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I ultimately stumbled upon this website. Studying this info So i am happy to convey that I’ve an incredibly good uncanny feeling I found out exactly what I needed. I so much unquestionably will make certain to don?t put out of your mind this web site and give it a glance regularly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s